OPTION 01
Performance Sprint
$1,499 / project
A focused starting scope for one clear priority and a smaller operating surface.
- Theme engineering
- Block systems
- Documented starting roadmap
WORDPRESS DEVELOPMENT PRICING
Choose between focused performance work, ongoing development capacity, and a headless architecture assessment.
These prices are published starting points, not automatic quotes. Final scope depends on the site, markets, access, technical condition, content requirements, and delivery responsibilities. We document those assumptions before work begins.
A focused starting scope for one clear priority and a smaller operating surface.
A broader working program for teams that need recurring execution and coordinated improvement.
A custom operating scope for larger sites, markets, catalogs, or stakeholder groups.
Cost changes when the program spans more templates, markets, integrations, approval layers, or production responsibilities. Existing analytics quality and implementation access also affect the work required.
Share goals, constraints, site access, and the commercial priority.
We inspect the operating surface and identify material dependencies.
You receive deliverables, responsibilities, cadence, and assumptions.
Work begins after access, owners, and acceptance criteria are clear.
They are starting points. A written proposal confirms the actual fee after the scope and responsibilities are understood.
No. Search platforms, markets, competitors, and customer behavior are outside any agency’s control. We commit to transparent work, documented decisions, and careful measurement.
Your agreement identifies ownership and access. We structure projects so your team retains the accounts, approved assets, and implementation documentation needed to continue operating.
Yes, through a documented change when new requirements or constraints appear. We explain the effect on cost and timing before additional work proceeds.
Pricing decision guide
Teams that need an editor-friendly WordPress system without allowing plugins, builders, templates, and hosting decisions to accumulate avoidable risk.
Work can include custom themes or blocks, content models, plugin review, integrations, migrations, performance, security hardening, accessibility, release workflows, and editor documentation.
It does not include indiscriminate plugin installation, unsupported premium licenses, concealing maintenance obligations, copying proprietary designs, or guaranteeing zero vulnerabilities.
Template and block count, legacy content, plugin dependencies, custom integrations, multisite needs, editorial roles, hosting, and migration risk affect scope.
We audit the current stack, define the target editing model, confirm content migration responsibilities, identify required integrations, and agree release and rollback procedures.
Define the editorial model before choosing blocks or plugins. Build and validate a representative template family, migrate content with clear transformations, rehearse release and rollback, and train editors on the maintained system.
Editors own content quality, developers own themes and integrations, hosting owners maintain infrastructure, security maintains update policy, and product accepts workflows.
Published prices are starting points, not invented certainty. The final scope depends on the website, markets, current condition, data quality, release process, dependencies, and which team owns implementation. These pages provide the context needed to compare responsibly.
Review the operational problem, work areas, outputs, and measurement approach before comparing starting prices.
See how access, diagnosis, priorities, owners, dependencies, and acceptance criteria are established.
Use case studies to understand specific project conditions rather than treating another company’s result as a forecast.
Compare the adjacent program when requirements cross channels, platforms, or delivery teams.
Compare the adjacent program when requirements cross channels, platforms, or delivery teams.
Share the website, objective, current baseline, platform, timeline, and implementation ownership for a defensible scope.